← Back to All Charts

How Far Did the Kumamoto Earthquake Travel?

Responsive chart embed
Copy the embed code and place this chart on your website.
<div class="flourish-embed flourish-map" data-src="visualisation/29875080"><script src="https://public.flourish.studio/resources/embed.js"></script><noscript><img src="https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/29875080/thumbnail" width="100%" alt="map visualization" /></noscript></div>
High-Resolution Chart Images
Open the image in Google Drive to view or download.
View images
Usage Guidelines
You may use the embed code and chart images in articles, presentations, reports, educational materials, and social content.
Do not remove embedded credits, misrepresent the data, resell the materials, or redistribute the original files.

About This Chart

Data Visualization Method

  • Data: Official per-station seismic intensities from the Japan Meteorological Agency for the 28 July 2026 Kumamoto mainshock. Station readings are observed; grid values are interpolated from them.
  • Moment and area: A single mainshock (16:27 local time, Mj 7.1, depth ~10 km), shown over an animated timeline across Japanese land.
  • Selection: Of 1,058 station records, the 1,050 with both a numeric intensity level and coordinates were used. Four "not yet received" records and four stations without matched coordinates were excluded.
  • Processing: A ~5 km land grid, each cell interpolated by inverse-distance weighting of its 12 nearest stations — held to about 20 km, then tapered from 20 to 65 km. Sparse cells were dropped and an isolated distant station was kept to a small local footprint.
  • Chart form: An animated point map. Color encodes interpolated intensity; two thin rings expanding from the epicenter stand for the P and S waves.

Creator's Note

The aim was to set human perception aside and ask a narrower question: where, and in what shape, did instruments actually record the shaking? Rather than reducing the event to a single magnitude number, it places the observed intensities on one comparable surface.

What stands out is that the shaking did not radiate as a clean circle. It concentrates near the epicenter and fades along the shape of the archipelago toward the northeast — a reading of distribution, not a ranking of places.

Data Sources

Limitations

Each grid color is an interpolated estimate from surrounding stations, not a direct measurement at that spot. The official values belong to the stations themselves; cells with almost no nearby observations were left out, and a lone distant station was handled locally so it would not spread into a wide patch.

The two rings are an editorial layer that conveys the direction and order in which the shaking unfolded — not real per-station arrival times or wave speeds. The color and point-size inputs are chosen for legibility, not as physical units of energy or acceleration.

A maximum intensity of 7 is a peak at particular sites, not a nationwide figure. Open sea and areas outside Japan fall outside this grid, and the softened northeastern edge is a deliberate choice to avoid cutting the observation boundary with a hard line. This is a map of recorded shaking, not of damage or casualties.